Uncover deeper insights by measuring the impact of a mechanical deformation on the conductive network, all powered by one simple accessory
Dielectric thermal analysis unlocks insights into the microstructure of complex fluids. ARES rheometers are capable of simultaneous electro-rheology or stand-alone dielectric measurements. Leveraging the ARES Rheometer motor control, collecting dielectric and rheological measurements simultaneously connects the impact of mechanical deformation on conductivity, capacitance, and permittivity. Dielectric analysis is a powerful technique for characterizing polar materials such as PVC, PVDF, PMMA and PVA, for investigating the stability of phase separating systems, and for monitoring curing kinetics of materials such as epoxy and urethane systems. In curing materials, this technique offers insights into the evolution of their structure and the rate of cure as indicated by electric current signals. In addition to mechanical structure, dielectric analysis reveals ion mobility as well, complementing rheology for more comprehensive material analysis.

Features & Benefits
- Flexible experimentation with either simultaneous rheological and dielectric measurements or stand-alone dielectric measurements
- Easy programming through powerful TRIOS software with fully synchronized dielectric & rheology signals
- Test a variety of materials with standard and disposable plates for curing systems
- ARES Rheometer quality data accuracy & consistency for curing materials with temperature and axial force control to accommodate shrinkage
- Wide dielectric frequency range: 20 Hz to 30 MHz
- Compatible with FCO over a temperature range of -150 °C to 350 °C
Technology
The ARES rheometers Dielectric Accessory consists of a set of specially insulated upper and lower geometries that can be directly installed on the rheometer – standard 25 mm parallel plates, as well as 8 mm or 40 mm disposable plates are available. The accessory is easy to install, and includes all the wiring and hardware required for interfacing with external dielectric LCR meters. The system is compatible with two popular Keysight LCR meters: E4980A (20 Hz to 2 MHz, 0.005 to 20 V) and 4285A (75 kHz to 30 MHz, 0.005 to 10 V). Temperature control is provided by the Forced Convection Oven from -150 °C to 350 °C. Combined with the superior axial force control up to 20 N, gap temperature compensation capability, and complete integration with the powerful TRIOS software, the dielectric accessory can be operated in either stand-alone dielectric mode or with simultaneous dielectric and mechanical measurements.
Dielectric Temperature Ramp at Multiple Frequencies
The figure shows a temperature ramp on a poly (methyl methacrylate), PMMA, sample at four different dielectric frequencies ranging from 1 kHz to 1 MHz. At low temperatures, below the transition, the magnitude of the storage permittivity (ε’) decreases as the dielectric frequency is increased. A similar response is also seen in the dielectric tan(δ) signal as well, which represents the ratio of the loss permittivity (ε”) to the storage permittivity (ε’). As the temperature is increased, the peak of the transition in tan(δ) moves to higher temperatures with increasing frequency – this reveals a shift in the dipole relaxation times to shorter time scales as the polymer chain mobility increases and demonstrates the powerful information that can be obtained from dielectric testing.

Phase Separation in Cosmetic Creams
The combination of rheological and dielectric testing can be applied to evaluate the temperature stability of materials such as food and cosmetic products. The figure shows data collected on two water-based cosmetic creams that were cooled from 25 °C to -30 °C. The rheology data, evaluated by the storage modulus (G’), shows that the POND’S® cream undergoes a sharp increase in the modulus at -18 °C whereas the NIVEA® cream exhibits a more continuous change in the modulus over the entire temperature range. The large jump in the POND’S cream rheology data could be interpreted as an indication of instability. However, the simultaneous collection of dielectric data gives additional insight into the behavior of these materials.
The plot also shows the loss permittivity (ε”) signal that quantifies the change in the ion mobility, primarily dictated by the water phase in these samples. The NIVEA cream shoes a two decade increase in ε” on cooling compared to a very small change in the POND’S cream. The large increase in ε” is due to increased ion mobility in the material as the water phase separates.
With this additional information, it can be seen that the NIVEA sample undergoes phase separation, while the POND’S sample does not. When phase separation occurs during the cooling process, the size of the water phase increases, gradually changing the sample morphology – this leads to a gradual increase in the G’ signal. By contrast, the large change in G’ of the POND’S cream is the result of a transition that is due to a more stable and uniform morphology.
